Headphones supplied to lawmakers during the opening session of the 13th National Parliament on March 12 have drawn criticism from members who questioned their quality and performance.
Mir Ahmed Bin Qasem, Member of Parliament from Dhaka-14, raised the issue during the session, saying many MPs were facing difficulties using the devices provided for parliamentary proceedings.
Several lawmakers complained that the headphones were not functioning properly, claiming that technical limitations and poor sound quality were disrupting the proceedings of the House.
Headphones Identified
An inquiry found that the headphones used in parliament were produced by Shure, a globally recognised brand known for microphones, wireless audio systems and headphones.
However, the model supplied to MPs is the Shure SRH240A, which is considered the brand’s entry-level and most affordable model.
According to information available on international e-commerce platform Amazon and the manufacturer’s official website, the headphone costs $69, which is approximately Tk 8,457 in Bangladeshi currency.
Technical Features
The SRH240A is primarily designed for home recording and general use. Key features include:
- Wide frequency range for clearer mid and high-range sound
- Strong bass output
- Padded headband and ear cups for long-term comfort
- Closed-back, circumaural design that helps reduce external noise
- Durable construction suitable for everyday use
- 6.3 mm nickel-plated adapter included in the package
- Two-year manufacturer warranty
More Advanced Models Available
The same brand offers several higher-end models with significantly higher prices, including:
- Shure AONIC 50 Gen 2 — $389 (about Tk 47,750)
- Shure SRH1840 — $549 (about Tk 67,332)
- Shure SRH1540 — $500 (about Tk 61,375)
- Shure SRH840A — $169 (about Tk 20,737)
- Shure SRH440A — $109 (about Tk 13,374)
Questions Raised in Parliament
The issue has sparked discussion and criticism among lawmakers, with some questioning why the most basic model was selected instead of a higher-quality option for parliamentary use.
MPs argued that better audio equipment is necessary to ensure uninterrupted concentration during important parliamentary sessions.
